A Novel Ultrasonographic Method to Detect Intra-Operative Syndesmotic Malreduction – the “Gap Penetrance” Sign

Category: Ankle; Other Introduction/Purpose: Anatomical reduction of the distal syndesmosis can be challenging. There is ongoing debate and variability in the methods used for evaluating the accuracy of reduction, including radiography, intra-operative CT, arthroscopy, and direct visualization. Tornetta et al. have described a method called ‘the articular surface method’ that evaluates the relationship between the articular cartilage of the distal anteromedial fibula and the anterolateral tibia as being significantly more accurate for detecting malreduction. However, it entails an additional surgical incision over the distal aspect of the ankle. The aim of this study was to find a non-invasive method using ultrasound to assess the accuracy of reduction in syndesmotic injuries. Methods: A cadaveric syndesmotic instability model was created by dissecting the PITFL, IOL, and AITFL through a small posterior incision. The fibula was fixed in incremental degrees of rotational malreduction to achieve a malreduction of 3, 5, and 7 mm. A blinded observer assessed the syndesmosis using a portable ultrasound device. The probe was placed in its short axis at the level of the ankle joint then moved proximally until both the anteromedial fibular and anterolateral tibial articular surfaces were visualized simultaneously in one view. In a reduced syndesmosis, the distal articular surfaces of the tibia and fibula overlap. This relationship is altered in a malreduced syndesmosis, which allows ultrasonographic waves to ‘penetrate’ through the malreduced articular surfaces and be readily detected. This sign was graded positive if an acoustic signal penetrated between the distal articular surfaces of the tibia and fibula, and negative if no acoustic signal was detected. Results: The gap penetrance sign was positive in all 3 instances of malreduced syndesmoses, and negative in an anatomically reduced syndesmosis. Figure 1 illustrates the outcomes in a reduced syndesmosis and malreduced syndesmosis, respectively. Conclusion: We introduced a novel sign that can be used as a surrogate of the ‘articular surface method’ to detect syndesmotic malreduction. It is accurate, can obviate the need for a separate surgical incision for direct visualization, permits rapid point-of- care evaluation in the operating room, and minimizes radiation exposur